Feedback about the 2019 version:
2019 Session Rating: 9.42
(The average overall session rating at the 2018 conference was 9.02) 2018 Bar-Shain Speaker Rating: 9.46 (The average speaker rating at the 2018 conference was 9.26) (source ExpressEvaluations.com) |
Feedback about the 2018 version:
2018 Session Rating: 9.29
(The average overall session rating at the 2018 conference was 8.97) 2018 Bar-Shain Speaker Rating: 9.35 (The average speaker rating at the 2018 conference was 9.06) (source ExpressEvaluations.com) |
Feedback about the 2016 version:
2016 Session Rating: 4.79
(The average overall session rating at the 2016 conference was 4.50) 2016 Bar-Shain Speaker Rating: 4.74 (The average speaker rating at the 2016 conference was 4.58) (source ExpressEvaluations.com) |
2018 Comments:
- I will take back examples that Metro Health is using to my facility.
- good topic what can we as health care profession to help patient.
- inspirational!
- Phenomenal program in place-something to aspire to
- Very interesting presentation
- Bravo MetroHealth for applying relatively simple solutions to help providers and patients. A great talk with busy slides and lots of detail but timed perfectly and appreciate the build appendix.
- Great talk! Great build appendix! Thank you for presenting.
- Extremely germane talk.
- Timely discussion about a serious epidemic
- Great job on having new things for an old topic!
- Great development and presentation of the development.
- Pain accordion report is visually nice...
- Creative solutions for the opioid crisis.
As usual from David Bar-Shain, a thoughtful and valuable presentation.
Excellent practitioner sensitive build.
This was one of the best PAC talks I ever heard. The blend of clinical and techy was masterful.
Great work to help your providers.
As always, MetroHealth (OH) presents something very practical in an engaging way.
What changes will you apply . . .
. . . We will look closely at the doc flowsheet calculator that he created for Opioid risk.
. . . Try to develop the clinician efficiency tools demonstrated.
. . . Design decision support help to reduce opioid prescriptions.
. . . Try to better integrate state prescription data base into EPIC.
. . . Increase the use of the EPIC tools that are available.
. . . Deepened approach to awareness and system prompt.
. . . Request our prescription drug monitoring program become integrated with Epic.
. . . I will try to get my network to have a better system to monitor patients as displayed.
. . . Implement flag and consider 3rd party vendor to facilitate look into database to affect clinical decision making.
. . . I really like the opioid risk tool flowsheet and the problem list documentation.
. . . Different approach to patients taking opiates
. . . Work to implement cdc guidelines more effectively in our organization.
. . . Discuss with my team exploring products that can be linked to my state opioid database so providers can check this more easily.
. . . Will integrate this information.
. . . Asking for integration of state monitoring with epic.
. . . Discuss with management potential changes to code as mentioned in this activity.
. . . Apply lessons learned from this talk in our rules and alerts committee work.
. . . Attempt to implement some of this.
. . . Make our opioid analytics more robust
. . . Know how to use Epic to manage pts on opioids.